flitched9000 (flitched9000) wrote,

  • Mood:
  • Music:


  1) Точна-а-а!!!

University economics teaching isn't an education: it's a £9,000 lobotomy
Economics took a battering after the financial crisis, but faculties are refusing to teach alternative views. It’s as if there’s only one way to run an economy
Aditya Chakrabortty, The Guardian, Friday 9 May 2014

  2) Steve Keen: The ECBs Eurozone Medicine is Nonsense
Posted on September 13, 2014 by Yves Smith

“You’ve just made your morning coffee, and look up in horror as you realise that the gas burner has set your kitchen ablaze. So you take decisive action: you pour your coffee on the floor.
Such is the real impact of the European Central Bank’s latest attempt to revive the European economy…

I’ll say that again, this time quoting the Bank of England:

As with the relationship between deposits and loans, the relationship between reserves and loans typically operates in the reverse way to that described in some economics textbooks. Banks first decide how much to lend depending on the profitable lending opportunities available to them … It is these lending decisions that determine how many bank deposits are created by the banking system. The amount of bank deposits in turn influences how much central bank money banks want to hold in reserve …, which is then, in normal times, supplied on demand by the Bank of England.

To summarise the Bank of England — and to repeat myself — reserves are irrelevant to bank lending. They only exist so that one bank can settle its accounts with another, and banks keep these accounts as low as they can manage. So charging private banks a trivial interest rate on their trivial reserve accounts is about as effective at stimulating an economy as pouring your coffee on the floor is at stopping a kitchen fire. If this is the best that the ECB can manage, then Great Depression levels of unemployment in Europe will persist.”

  3) Taxes and Growth
“The upshot is that there is no evidence that you can change the growth rate of the economy – up or down – by changing tax rates – up or down. Their [William Gale and Andy Samwick have a new Brookings paper…] conclusion is more coherent than anything I could gin up, so here goes:

The argument that income tax cuts raise growth is repeated so often that it is sometimes taken as gospel. However, theory, evidence, and simulation studies tell a different and more complicated story. Tax cuts offer the potential to raise economic growth by improving incentives to work, save, and invest. But they also create income effects that reduce the need to engage in productive economic activity, and they may subsidize old capital, which provides windfall gains to asset holders that undermine incentives for new activity.

The effects of tax cuts on growth are completely uncertain.”
Tags: "честные выборы" inc., banksters, budgeting, c'est la vie, coca-cola, competition crusade, economics, methodology, political economy, statistics, taxation, truth, wb, zoonews, ВШЭ заела, ЦБ, бобик сдох, болонья головного мозга, война не для генералов, вундервафля, грызня bander-logs, их нравы, либеразм головного мозга, мальчиш-кибальчиш, матрац, наука такая наука, находка для шпиона, пиндоз головного мозга, рыло в пуху, экономика и политика

promo flitched9000 april 27, 2013 20:19 5
Buy for 10 tokens
ПредуведомлениеLibero™: цените каждое обкакивание! Moment™: цените каждый момент! Напоминание «Я смотрю на себя, как на ребёнка, который, играя на морском берегу, нашел несколько камешков поглаже и раковин попестрее, чем удавалось другим, в то время как неизмеримый океан истины…
  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded